PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED THE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, BOARD COMMITTEES, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ON THE BASIS OF ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AND VARIOUS CRITERIA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE, EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS ETC. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS AND OUTCOME. THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS ALSO EVALUATED BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THE SEPARATE MEETING HELD OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED THE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, BOARD COMMITTEES, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ON THE BASIS OF ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AND VARIOUS CRITERIA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE, EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS ETC. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS AND OUTCOME. THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS ALSO EVALUATED BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THE SEPARATE MEETING HELD OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED THE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, BOARD COMMITTEES, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ON THE BASIS OF ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AND VARIOUS CRITERIA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE, EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS ETC. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS AND OUTCOME. THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS ALSO EVALUATED BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THE SEPARATE MEETING HELD BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED THE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, BOARD COMMITTEES, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ON THE BASIS OF ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AND VARIOUS CRITERIA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE, EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS ETC. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS AND OUTCOME. THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS ALSO EVALUATED BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THE SEPARATE MEETING HELD BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED THE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, BOARD COMMITTEES, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ON THE BASIS OF ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AND VARIOUS CRITERIA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE, EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS ETC. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS AND OUTCOME. THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS ALSO EVALUATED BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THE SEPARATE MEETING HELD OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND RULES MADE THEREUNDER, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED THE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, BOARD COMMITTEES, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD ON THE BASIS OF ATTENDANCE, CONTRIBUTION AND VARIOUS CRITERIA AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE, EXPERIENCE AND EXPERTISE, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS ETC. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS AND OUTCOME. THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS ALSO EVALUATED BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THE SEPARATE MEETING HELD BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |