| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD WORKS WITH THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TO LAY DOWN THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS (INCLUDING CHAIRMAN) THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDERS’ RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE BOARD HAS DEVISED QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCES OF EACH OF EXECUTIVE, NON- EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. SUCH QUESTIONS ARE PREPARED CONSIDERING THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND THE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE BOARD HAVE FROM EACH OF THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING KEY AREAS: 1. ATTENDANCE AT THE BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS; 2. QUALITY OF CONTRIBUTION TO BOARD DELIBERATIONS; 3. STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES OR INPUTS REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH OF COMPANY AND ITS PERFORMANCE; 4. PROVIDING PERSPECTIVES AND FEEDBACK GOING BEYOND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGEMENT. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD WORKS WITH THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TO LAY DOWN THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS (INCLUDING CHAIRMAN) THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDERS’ RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE BOARD HAS DEVISED QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCES OF EACH OF EXECUTIVE, NON-EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. SUCH QUESTIONS ARE PREPARED CONSIDERING THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND THE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE BOARD HAVE FROM EACH OF THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING KEY AREAS: 1. ATTENDANCE AT THE BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS; 2. QUALITY OF CONTRIBUTION TO BOARD DELIBERATIONS; 3. STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES OR INPUTS REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH OF COMPANY AND ITS PERFORMANCE; 4. PROVIDING PERSPECTIVES AND FEEDBACK GOING BEYOND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGEMENT. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD WORKS WITH THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TO LAY DOWN THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS (INCLUDING CHAIRMAN) THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDERS‘ RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE BOARD HAS DEVISED QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCES OF EACH OF EXECUTIVE, NON-EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. SUCH QUESTIONS ARE PREPARED CONSIDERING THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND THE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE BOARD HAVE FROM EACH OF THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING KEY AREAS: 1. ATTENDANCE AT THE BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS; 2. QUALITY OF CONTRIBUTION TO BOARD DELIBERATIONS; 3. STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES OR INPUTS REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH OF COMPANY AND ITS PERFORMANCE; 4. PROVIDING PERSPECTIVES AND FEEDBACK GOING BEYOND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGEMENT. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD WORKS WITH THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TO LAY DOWN THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS (INCLUDING CHAIRMAN) THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDERS’ RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. II. THE BOARD HAS DEVISED QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCES OF EACH OF EXECUTIVE, NON- EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. SUCH QUESTIONS ARE PREPARED CONSIDERING THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND THE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE BOARD HAVE FROM EACH OF THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING KEY AREAS: A. ATTENDANCE AT THE BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS; B. QUALITY OF CONTRIBUTION TO BOARD DELIBERATIONS; C. STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES OR INPUTS REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH OF COMPANY AND ITS PERFORMANCE; D. PROVIDING PERSPECTIVES AND FEEDBACK GOING BEYOND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGEMENT. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD WORKS WITH THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TO LAY DOWN THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS (INCLUDING CHAIRMAN) THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDERS’ RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. II. THE BOARD HAS DEVISED QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCES OF EACH OF EXECUTIVE, NON- EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. SUCH QUESTIONS ARE PREPARED CONSIDERING THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND THE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE BOARD HAVE FROM EACH OF THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING KEY AREAS: A. ATTENDANCE AT THE BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS; B. QUALITY OF CONTRIBUTION TO BOARD DELIBERATIONS; C. STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES OR INPUTS REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH OF COMPANY AND ITS PERFORMANCE; D. PROVIDING PERSPECTIVES AND FEEDBACK GOING BEYOND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGEMENT |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD WORKS WITH THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TO LAY DOWN THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS (INCLUDING CHAIRMAN) THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDERS’ RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE BOARD HAS DEVISED QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCES OF EACH OF EXECUTIVE, NON-EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. SUCH QUESTIONS ARE PREPARED CONSIDERING THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND THE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE BOARD HAVE FROM EACH OF THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING KEY AREAS: 1. ATTENDANCE AT THE BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS; 2. QUALITY OF CONTRIBUTION TO BOARD DELIBERATIONS; 3. STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES OR INPUTS REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH OF COMPANY AND ITS PERFORMANCE; 4. PROVIDING PERSPECTIVES AND FEEDBACK GOING BEYOND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGEMENT |