DURING THE YEAR UNDER REVIEW, THE BOARD, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, HAS ADOPTED FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD.THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD, AS A WHOLE AND THE CHAIRMAN, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS THEIR PARTICIPATION, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE,INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENTS, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST, ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD AND BOARD AS A WHOLE WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN THEIR SEPARATE MEETING. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS REVIEWED KEY TRANSACTIONS (INCLUDING RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS), QUALITY & TIMELINESS OF FLOW OF INFORMATION, RECOMMENDED MEASURES FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, ETC THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |
DURING THE YEAR UNDER REVIEW, THE BOARD, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, HAS ADOPTED FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD &COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD, AS A WHOLE AND THE CHAIRMAN, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS THEIR PARTICIPATION, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENTS, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST, ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD AND BOARD AS A WHOLE WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN THEIR SEPARATE MEETING. THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY |
DURING THE YEAR UNDER REVIEW, THE BOARD, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, HAS ADOPTED FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD, AS A WHOLE AND THE CHAIRMAN, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS THEIR PARTICIPATION, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENTS, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST, ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD AND BOARD AS A WHOLE WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN THEIR SEPARATE MEETING. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS REVIEWED KEY TRANSACTIONS (INCLUDING RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS), QUALITY & TIMELINESS OF FLOW OF INFORMATION, RECOMMENDED MEASURES FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, ETC THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |
DURING THE YEAR UNDER REVIEW, THE BOARD, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS OF SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, HAS ADOPTED FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. THE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARDS FUNCTIONING SUCH AS COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD & COMMITTEES, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE BOARD, AS A WHOLE AND THE CHAIRMAN, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS THEIR PARTICIPATION, CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS AND OTHERWISE, INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENTS, SAFEGUARDING OF MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS INTEREST, ETC. THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD AND THAT OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD AND BOARD AS A WHOLE WERE CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN THEIR SEPARATE MEETING. THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS REVIEWED KEY TRANSACTIONS (INCLUDING RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS), QUALITY & TIMELINESS OF FLOW OF INFORMATION, RECOMMENDED MEASURES FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, ETC THE DIRECTORS WERE SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES WITH THE COMPANY. |