PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND THE SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AS WELL AS PERFORMANCE OF THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT BY WAY OF A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD'S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE AND THE EVALUATION WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION IS PERFORMED BY THE BOARD, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. IN LINE WITH SEBI CIRCULAR NO. SEBI/HO/CFD/CMD/CIR/P/2017/004, DATED JANUARY 5, 2017, THE COMPANY HAS ADOPTED THE CRITERIA RECOMMENDED BY THE SEBI. THE DIRECTORS WERE GIVEN FIVE FORMS FOR EVALUATION OF THE FOLLOWING: (I) EVALUATION OF BOARD; (II) EVALUATION OF COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD; (III) EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS; (IV) EVALUATION OF MANAGING DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS; AND (V) EVALUATION OF CHAIRMAN. THE DIRECTORS WERE REQUESTED TO GIVE FOLLOWING RATINGS FOR EACH CRITERIA: 1. COULD DO MORE TO MEET EXPECTATIONS; 2. MEETS EXPECTATIONS; AND 3. EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS. THE CHAIRPERSON, BASED ON THE EVALUATION DONE BY THE DIRECTORS, INFORMED THAT THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS IS SATISFACTORY AND THEY ARE RECOMMENDED FOR CONTINUATION AS DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT AND OTHER COMMITTEES. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS PREPARED AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS ETC. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SECRETARIAL DEPARTMENT. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT AND OTHER COMMITTEES. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS PREPARED AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS ETC. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SECRETARIAL DEPARTMENT. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT AND OTHER COMMITTEES. A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS PREPARED AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD'S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGMENT, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS ETC. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WHO ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SECRETARIAL DEPARTMENT. THE DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND THE SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AS WELL AS PERFORMANCE OF THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT BY WAY OF A STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD'S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE AND THE EVALUATION WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON RESPONSES RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION IS PERFORMED BY THE BOARD, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WITH SPECIFIC FOCUS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. THE DIRECTORS WERE GIVEN FIVE FORMS FOR EVALUATION OF THE FOLLOWING: (I) EVALUATION OF BOARD; (II) EVALUATION OF COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD; (III) EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS; (IV) EVALUATION OF MANAGING DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS; AND (V) EVALUATION OF CHAIRMAN. THE CHAIRPERSON, BASED ON THE EVALUATION DONE BY THE DIRECTORS, INFORMED THAT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DIRECTORS IS SATISFACTORY, AND THEY ARE RECOMMENDED FOR CONTINUATION AS DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |