PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015 AND NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION POLICY OF THE COMPANY, NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY SPECIFIED THE MANNER FOR EFFECTIVE EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. BASED ON THE SAME, THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD HAS EVALUATED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE CONSTITUTED AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS INCLUDING INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE WAS EVALUATED ON THE BASIS OF CRITERIA SUCH AS THE BOARD SIZE, STRUCTURE, EXPERTISE OF THE BOARD, DEVELOPMENT OF SUITABLE STRATEGIES AND BUSINESS PLANS, OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE, EFFORTS TO LEARN ABOUT THE COMPANY AND ITS BUSINESS, ETC. THE PERFORMANCE OF THE COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD WAS EVALUATED ON THE BASIS OF CRITERIA SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES, APPROPRIATE NUMBER OF MEETINGS, CONFIDENTIALITY OF ITS DISCUSSIONS/DECISIONS, SUGGESTIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD, ETC. PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS WAS EVALUATED ON THE BASIS OF CRITERIA SUCH AS THE APPROPRIATENESS OF QUALIFICATION, KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE, PARTICIPATION IN BOARD FUNCTIONING, EXTENT OF DIVERSITY IN KNOWLEDGE AND INDUSTRY EXPERTISE, ATTENDANCE AND PARTICIPATIONS IN THE MEETINGS AND WORKING THEREOF, INITIATIVE TO MAINTAINING HIGH LEVEL OF INTEGRITY AND ETHICS, ETC. IN A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND THE BOARD AS A WHOLE WAS EVALUATED. THE QUALITY, QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS OF FLOW OF INFORMATION BETWEEN THE COMPANY MANAGEMENT AND THE BOARD WHICH IS NECESSARY FOR THE BOARD TO EFFECTIVELY AND REASONABLY PERFORM THEIR DUTIES WAS ALSO EVALUATED. |