| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LODR) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. DURING THE FINANCIAL YEAR, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES SUCH AS THEIR COMPOSITION, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH DIRECTOR INCLUDING THE BOARD'S CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, ATTENDANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT ASPECTS. THE BOARD WAS SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD, COMMITTEES AND THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY.OUR COMPANY HAS LAID OUT THE CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING THE INDEPENDENCE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND HAD IN PLACE A ROBUST EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS, EVEN BEFORE THE PROMULGATION OF SEBI (LODR) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2018. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LODR) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. DURING THE ?NANCIAL YEAR, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES SUCH AS THEIR COMPOSITION, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECI?C DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR INCLUDING THE BOARD’S CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, ATTENDANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT ASPECTS. THE BOARD WAS SATIS?ED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH RE?ECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD, COMMITTEES AND THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LODR) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. DURING THE ?NANCIAL YEAR, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES SUCH AS THEIR COMPOSITION, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECI?C DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH DIRECTOR INCLUDING THE BOARD'S CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, ATTENDANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT ASPECTS. THE BOARD WAS SATIS?ED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH RE?ECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD, COMMITTEES AND THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LODR) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. DURING THE FINANCIAL YEAR, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES SUCH AS THEIR COMPOSITION, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH DIRECTOR INCLUDING THE BOARD'S CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, ATTENDANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT ASPECTS. THE BOARD WAS SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD, COMMITTEES AND THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LODR) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. DURING THE ?NANCIAL YEAR, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES SUCH AS THEIR COMPOSITION, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECI?C DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH DIRECTOR INCLUDING THE BOARD'S CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, ATTENDANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT ASPECTS. THE BOARD WAS SATIS?ED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH RE?ECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD, COMMITTEES AND THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |
| PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LODR) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING ITS PERFORMANCE & THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD. DURING THE FINANCIAL YEAR, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT THROUGH A STRUCTURED EVALUATION PROCESS COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE FUNCTIONING OF THE BOARD AND COMMITTEES SUCH AS THEIR COMPOSITION, EXPERIENCE & COMPETENCIES, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES & OBLIGATIONS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES ETC. A SEPARATE EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR INCLUDING THE BOARD'S CHAIRMAN WHO WERE EVALUATED ON PARAMETERS SUCH AS CONTRIBUTION AT THE MEETINGS, INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT, ATTENDANCE AND OTHER RELEVANT ASPECTS. THE BOARD WAS SATISFIED WITH THE EVALUATION RESULTS, WHICH REFLECTED THE OVERALL ENGAGEMENT OF THE BOARD, COMMITTEES AND THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. |