PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT AND LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, ITS COMMITTEES, AND ALL THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY AS PER THE GUIDANCE NOTES ISSUED BY SEBI IN THIS REGARD. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE HAS ALSO REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, THE COMMITTEE AND ALL DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY AS REQUIRED UNDER THE ACT AND THE LISTING REGULATIONS. I. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF THE BOARD CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF THE BOARD BROADLY COVERS THE COMPETENCY, EXPERIENCE, QUALIFICATION OF THE DIRECTOR, DIVERSITY OF THE BOARD, MEETING PROCEDURES, STRATEGY, MANAGEMENT RELATIONS, SUCCESSION PLANNING, FUNCTIONS, DUTIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL, CORPORATE CULTURE AND VALUES, GOVERNANCE AND COMPLIANCE, AND EVALUATION OF RISKS, AMONG OTHER THINGS. II. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF THE COMMITTEE CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF THE COMMITTEE COVERS MANDATE AND COMPOSITION, EFFECTIVENESS, STRUCTURE AND MEETINGS, INDEPENDENCE OF THE COMMITTEE FROM THE BOARD, AND CONTRIBUTION TO THE DECISIONS OF THE BOARD. III. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF DIRECTORS THESE BROADLY COVER QUALIFICATION, EXPERIENCE, KNOWLEDGE AND COMPETENCY, ABILITY TO FUNCTION AS A TEAM, INITIATIVE, ATTENDANCE, COMMITMENT, CONTRIBUTION, INTEGRITY, INDEPENDENCE, PARTICIPATION AT MEETINGS, KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS, PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES, LEADERSHIP, AND IMPARTIALITY, AMONG OTHER THINGS. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. |