PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS & DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ALONG WITH THE BOARD HAVE ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (INCLUDING EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS) AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL/ SENIOR MANAGEMENT ETC. IN THE PAST, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON VARIOUS PARAMETERS SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD, EXPERIENCE, COMPETENCIES, CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS ACCURATE FINANCIAL REPORTING, STRATEGIC GUIDANCE, RISK MITIGATION, INTERNAL CONTROLS, GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND TALENT DEVELOPMENT, MANAGING EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES, ETC. CONSEQUENT TO ADMISSION OF THE COMPANY INTO CIRP, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 20, 2019, SINCE POWERS OF THE BOARD IS SUSPENDED, THE PERFORMANCE ANNUAL EVALUATION WAS NOT CARRIED OUT THEREAFTER. |
IN TERMS OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT READ WITH SCHEDULE V TO THE ACT AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS PUT IN PLACE A PROCESS TO FORMALLY EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BOARD ALONG WITH PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EACH DIRECTOR TO BE CARRIED OUT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. ACCORDINGLY, THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED AND EVALUATION OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE WAS DONE BY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2016-17. THE BOARD HAS ALSO CARRIED OUT EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF THE AUDIT, STAKEHOLDERS RELATIONSHIP AND NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEES. THE CRITERIA DEVISED FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CONSISTS OF MAINTAINING CONFIDENTIALITY, MAINTAINING TRANSPARENCY, PARTICIPATION IN COMPANY MEETINGS, MONITORING COMPLIANCES, SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS & DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ALONG WITH THE BOARD HAVE ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (INCLUDING EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS) AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL/ SENIOR MANAGEMENT ETC. IN THE PAST, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON VARIOUS PARAMETERS SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD, EXPERIENCE, COMPETENCIES, CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS ACCURATE FINANCIAL REPORTING, STRATEGIC GUIDANCE, RISK MITIGATION, INTERNAL CONTROLS, GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND TALENT DEVELOPMENT, MANAGING EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES, ETC.CONSEQUENT TO ADMISSION OF THE COMPANY INTO CIRP, EFFECTIVE 20TH DECEMBER, 2019, SINCE POWERS OF THE BOARD IS SUSPENDED, THE PERFORMANCE ANNUAL EVALUATION WAS NOT CARRIED OUT THEREAFTER. |
PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT READ WITH SCHEDULE IV TO THE ACT AND REGULATION 17 OF THE LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS PUT IN PLACE A PROCESS TO FORMALLY EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE BOARD ALONG WITH PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EACH DIRECTOR TO BE CARRIED OUT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. ACCORDINGLY, THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED AND EVALUATION OF THE BOARD INCLUDING THE CHAIRMAN AS A WHOLE WAS DONE BY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2017-18. THE BOARD HAS ALSO CARRIED OUT EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, STAKEHOLDERS RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE AND NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE CRITERIA DEVISED FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CONSISTS OF MAINTAINING CONFIDENTIALITY, MAINTAINING TRANSPARENCY, PARTICIPATION IN COMPANY MEETINGS, MONITORING COMPLIANCES, SHARING THE KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY. |
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, A FORMAL ANNUAL EVALUATION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY THE BOARD OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AND THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS. SCHEDULE IV TO THE ACT, STATES THAT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED. THE BOARD WORKS WITH THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE TO LAY DOWN THE EVALUATION CRITERIA. THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE WORKING OF ITS AUDIT COMMITTEE, NOMINATION & REMUNERATION COMMITTEE AND STAKEHOLDERS' RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY. THE BOARD HAS DEVISED QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCES OF EACH OF EXECUTIVE, NON-EXECUTIVE AND INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. SUCH QUESTIONS ARE PREPARED CONSIDERING THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND THE EXPECTATIONS THAT THE BOARD HAVE FROM EACH OF THE DIRECTORS. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF DIRECTORS COMPRISES OF THE FOLLOWING KEY AREAS: I. ATTENDANCE OF BOARD MEETINGS AND BOARD COMMITTEE MEETINGS; II. QUALITY OF CONTRIBUTION TO BOARD DELIBERATIONS; III. STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES OR INPUTS REGARDING FUTURE GROWTH OF COMPANY AND ITS PERFORMANCE; IV. PROVIDING PERSPECTIVES AND FEEDBACK GOING BEYOND INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE MANAGEMENT. V. ABILITY TO CONTRIBUTE TO AND MONITOR OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES DURING THE FINANCIAL YEAR UNDER REVIEW, THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE REVIEWED THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL THE EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS. A SEPARATE MEETING OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS HELD FOR EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE AND PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN. |
PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS & DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ALONG WITH THE BOARD HAVE ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (INCLUDING EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS) AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL/ SENIOR MANAGEMENT ETC. IN THE PAST, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON VARIOUS PARAMETERS SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD, EXPERIENCE, COMPETENCIES, CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS ACCURATE FINANCIAL REPORTING, STRATEGIC GUIDANCE, RISK MITIGATION, INTERNAL CONTROLS, GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND TALENT DEVELOPMENT, MANAGING EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES, ETC. CONSEQUENT TO ADMISSION OF THE COMPANY INTO CIRP, EFFECTIVE 20TH DECEMBER, 2019, SINCE POWERS OF THE BOARD IS SUSPENDED, THE PERFORMANCE ANNUAL EVALUATION WAS NOT CARRIED OUT THEREAFTER. |
PURSUANT TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS & DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ALONG WITH THE BOARD HAD ADOPTED A FORMAL MECHANISM FOR EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (INCLUDING EXECUTIVE AND NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS) AS WELL AS THAT OF ITS COMMITTEES AND INDIVIDUAL DIRECTORS, INCLUDING CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, KEY MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL/ SENIOR MANAGEMENT ETC. IN THE PAST, THE EVALUATION EXERCISE WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON VARIOUS PARAMETERS SUCH AS THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD, EXPERIENCE, COMPETENCIES, CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS ACCURATE FINANCIAL REPORTING, STRATEGIC GUIDANCE, RISK MITIGATION, INTERNAL CONTROLS, GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND TALENT DEVELOPMENT, MANAGING EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS, GOVERNANCE ISSUES, ETC. CONSEQUENT TO ADMISSION OF THE COMPANY INTO CIRP, EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 20, 2019, SINCE THE POWERS OF THE BOARD IS SUSPENDED, THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION COULD NOT BE CARRIED OUT THEREAFTER. |