NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE HAD LAID DOWN THE CRITERIA AND PRESCRIBED A PEER EVALUATION METHODOLOGY BY WAY OF SET OF QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR, COMMITTEE(S) OF THE BOARD, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE BOARD AS A WHOLE. THE BOARD SUBSEQUENTLY CARRIED OUT THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AS PER THE METHODOLOGY. 1. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE BOARD AS WHOLE WAS ASSESSED BASED ON THE CRITERIA VIZ., ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION, MIX OF SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE, ITS MEETING SEQUENCE, DECISION MAKING, QUALITY OF INFORMATION, PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATION AND GOVERNANCE. 2. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDIVIDUAL DIRECTOR INCLUDING CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD, WAS CARRIED OUT BASED ON HIS/HER COMMITMENT TO ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY, LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT AND CONTRIBUTION, INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGEMENT, STRATEGIC AND LATERAL THINKING, SAFEGUARDING THE INTEREST OF THE COMPANY AND ITS MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS, ETC. 3. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SENIOR MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL WAS DETERMINED BASED ON THEIR PERFORMANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT OF BUSINESS PLANS AS APPROVED BY THE BOARD AND MANAGEMENT, THEIR COMMITMENT TOWARDS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY, LEADERSHIP QUALITY, PRODUCTIVITY, TEAM MANAGEMENT, ETC FURTHER, INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, IN THEIR MEETING HELD ON 09 NOVEMBER 2023 (WITHOUT THE PARTICIPATION OF NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR AND PERSONNEL FROM MANAGEMENT), HAD CONSIDERED AND EVALUATED THE BOARD’S PERFORMANCE ON THE WHOLE, THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRMAN AND OTHER NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS THERE ARE NO OBSERVATIONS OR PENDING ACTIONS ON THE BOARD EVALUATION. THE BOARD EXPRESSED ITS SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS AND RESULTS THEREOF. |