Indian Boards Database

PRESENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS As last updated by the Company/Indian Boards on 26-JUL-2024

Sl.No.	Director Name	Position on the Board
1.	SHYAM SUNDER GENDALAL MUNDRA (MR.)	CHAIRPERSON, MANAGING DIRECTOR, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PROMOTER-DIRECTOR

2.	ANURAG SHYAM SUNDER MUNDRA (MR.)
3.	VIKALP SHYAM SUNDER MUNDRA (MR.)

4.	SURABHI AGRAWAL (MS.)
5.	GIRISH KATARIA (MR.)
6.	NILESH KUMAR RATHI (MR.)

Note:

The information shown above is as provided by the company/updated by us.
There could be a time lag between the date of company filing information/correction with us and the same getting reflected on this website, mainly because of the processes involved as also the need for data verification/cleaning.
Tenure of directors has been captured from announcements starting from 01-Aug-2017 onwards.
Data for a company prior to its listing on NSE is not available.
Data for Companies exclusively listed on BSE with market capitalization more than Rs. 1000 crore is available from 1st April 2019 onwards.
In case you notice any discrepancies with the data, you are requested to let us know immediately so that we can take appropriate action.

COMMITTEES

1.	AUDIT COMMITTEE
2.	COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
3.	CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE
4.	FUND RAISING COMMITTEE
5.	MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
6.	NOMINATION & REMUNERATION COMMITTEE
7.	STAKEHOLDERS/INVESTORS RELATIONSHIP COMMITTEE

Note:

The information shown above is as provided by the company/updated by us.
There could be a time lag between the date of company filing information/correction with us and the same getting reflected on this website, mainly because of the processes involved as also the need for data verification/cleaning.
Data for a company prior to its listing on NSE is not available.
Committee details is available from 2015-16 onwards.
Data for Companies exclusively listed on BSE with market capitalization more than Rs. 1000 crore is available from 1st April 2019 onwards.
In case you notice any discrepancies with the data, you are requested to let us know immediately so that we can take appropriate action.

REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (Rs.lacs)

Director Name	Position on the Board	First Date of Appointment
None

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (Rs.lacs)

Director Name	Position on the Board	First Date of Appointment
None

View Remuneration Break-Up

Note:

The information shown above is as provided by the company/updated by us.
There could be a time lag between the date of company filing information/correction with us and the same getting reflected on this website, mainly because of the processes involved as also the need for data verification/cleaning.
Remuneration data is available from 2009-10 onwards.
For standardizing the remuneration data across different financial years/accounting periods of companies, remuneration figures for years other than an 'April-March' Financial Year have been adjusted on a pro-rata basis. For e.g. remuneration for calendar year 2020 (viz. January-December 2020) has been taken 3 months into 2019-20 and 9 months into 2020-21.
Bonus/Commission/Variable Pay is added in the year to which it pertains and not the year in which it is paid out.
Stock Options/Shares Held figures at any date other than 31st March have been reflected as the holding on the end date of the financial year in which that date is falling. For e.g. Stock Options/Shares Held figures on 31st December 2019 shall reflect as Stock Options/Shares Held figures on 31st March 2020.
In case sitting fee is revised mid-year and neither the total amount paid as sitting fee to a particular director nor director-wise date-wise board meetings attended has been specified, the total number of board meetings held during the year have been pro-rated on the basis of the date of revision of the sitting fee.

Ratio to Median Remuneration has been captured from 2016-17 onwards.
Professional Fee is available from FY 2016-17 onwards.
Data for a company prior to its listing on NSE is not available.
Data for Companies exclusively listed on BSE with market capitalization more than Rs. 1000 crore is available from 1st April 2019 onwards.
In case you notice any discrepancies with the data, you are requested to let us know immediately so that we can take appropriate action.

CESSATION OF DIRECTORS

Sl.No.	Director Name	Last Held Position on the Board	Independent Director	First Date of Appointment as a Director	Date of Cessation	Reason of Cessation
NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR CESSATIONS
None
INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR CESSATIONS
1.	PRAKASH DANDEKAR (MR.)	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	29-MAR-2018 Click here to view subsequent re-appointment/cessation dates	28-MAR-2022	RETIRED/SUPERANNUATED/TERM EXPIRED
2.	YAMINI KARMARKAR (DR.(MS.))	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	29-MAR-2018 Click here to view subsequent re-appointment/cessation dates	28-MAR-2022	RETIRED/SUPERANNUATED/TERM EXPIRED
3.	PIYUSH KUMAR SINHA (PROF.(DR.(MR.)))	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	13-FEB-2018 Click here to view subsequent re-appointment/cessation dates	12-FEB-2022	RETIRED/SUPERANNUATED/TERM EXPIRED
4.	RAJIVA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA (MR.)	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	24-APR-2013	31-MAR-2018	RETIRED/SUPERANNUATED/TERM EXPIRED
5.	SANTOSH MUCHHAL (CA (MR.))	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	24-APR-2013	31-MAR-2018	RETIRED/SUPERANNUATED/TERM EXPIRED
6.	AARTI JHAVERI (MS.)	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	19-NOV-2010	31-MAR-2018	RETIRED/SUPERANNUATED/TERM EXPIRED
7.	MANISH AGARWAL (MR.)	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	14-NOV-2014	12-OCT-2015	RESIGNED (DUE TO CHANGE IN ROLE)
8.	NARENDRA BELI (MR.)	NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR	YES	19-NOV-2010	14-NOV-2014	RESIGNED (NO REASON STATED)

Note:

The information shown above is as provided by the company/updated by us.
There could be a time lag between the date of company filing information/correction with us and the same getting reflected on this website, mainly because of the processes involved as also the need for data verification/cleaning.
Cessations data is from 1 January 2006 onwards.
Data for a company prior to its listing on NSE is not available.
Data for Companies exclusively listed on BSE with market capitalization more than Rs. 1000 crore is available from 1st April 2019 onwards.
In case you notice any discrepancies with the data, you are requested to let us know immediately so that we can take appropriate action.

ATTENDANCE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Director Name	Position on the Board	Independent Director	(Total No. of Board Meetings held : )
Director Name	Position on the Board	Independent Director	Total No. of Board Meetings held during the Tenure of Director	No. of Board Meetings Attended	% Attendance
None

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Director Name	Position on the Board	Independent Director	(Total No. of Board Meetings Held : )
Director Name	Position on the Board	Independent Director	Total No. of Board Meetings held during the Tenure of Director	No. of Board Meetings Attended	% Attendance
None

Note:

The information shown above is as provided by the company/updated by us.
There could be a time lag between the date of company filing information/correction with us and the same getting reflected on this website, mainly because of the processes involved as also the need for data verification/cleaning.
Board Meeting Attendance data is available from 2014-15 onwards.
Data for a company prior to its listing on NSE is not available.
Data for Companies exclusively listed on BSE with market capitalization more than Rs. 1000 crore is available from 1st April 2019 onwards.
In case you notice any discrepancies with the data, you are requested to let us know immediately so that we can take appropriate action.

BOARD EVALUATION DETAILS

2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23

THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND OTHER DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED WHEREAS EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WERE DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN A SEPARATE MEETING IN WHICH ONLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE PRESENT. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT FROM EACH DIRECTOR ABOUT THEIR VIEWS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD COVERING VARIOUS CRITERIA SUCH AS DEGREE OF FULFILLMENT OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES, BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, ESTABLISHMENT AND DELINEATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, BOARD CULTURE AND DYNAMICS, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE MANAGEMENT AND EFFICACY OF COMMUNICATION WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, OVERSIGHT OF COMPANY’S SUBSIDIARIES, ETC. FEEDBACK WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM EVERY DIRECTOR ON HIS ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE OTHER DIRECTORS. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (NRC) THEN DISCUSSED THE ABOVE FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS. BASED ON THE INPUTS RECEIVED, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NRC ALSO MADE A PRESENTATION TO THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THEIR MEETING, SUMMARIZING THE INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS AS REGARDS BOARD PERFORMANCE AS A WHOLE, AND OF THE CHAIRMAN. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. QUALITATIVE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF DIRECTORS WERE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE DIRECTORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. SOME OF THE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ON THE BASIS OF WHICH THE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS DONE ARE AS FOLLOWS: A. ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN LONG-TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING. B. ABILITY TO CONTRIBUTE GOOD PRACTICES FOLLOWED INTERNATIONALLY TO DEAL TOP MANAGEMENT ISSUES. C. FULFILLMENT OF DIRECTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES AS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE ACT. D. COMMITMENT TO ATTEND MEETINGS OF BOARD AND COMMITTEES. E. ABILITY TO MONITOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF COMPANY AND EFFECTIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT IF ANY REQUIRED.

THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND OTHER DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED WHEREAS EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN A SEPARATE MEETING IN WHICH ONLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE PRESENT. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT FROM EACH DIRECTOR ABOUT THEIR VIEWS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD COVERING VARIOUS CRITERIA SUCH AS DEGREE OF FULFILLMENT OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES, BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, ESTABLISHMENT AND DELINEATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, BOARD CULTURE AND DYNAMICS, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE MANAGEMENT AND EFFICACY OF COMMUNICATION WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, OVERSIGHT OF COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES, ETC. FEEDBACK WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM EVERY DIRECTOR ON HIS ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE OTHER DIRECTORS. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (NRC) THEN DISCUSSED THE ABOVE FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS. BASED ON THE INPUTS RECEIVED, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NRC ALSO MADE A PRESENTATION TO THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THEIR MEETING, SUMMARIZING THE INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS AS REGARDS TO BOARD PERFORMANCE AS A WHOLE, AND OF THE CHAIRMAN. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. QUALITATIVE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF DIRECTORS WERE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE DIRECTORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS.

THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND OTHER DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED WHEREAS EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN A SEPARATE MEETING IN WHICH ONLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE PRESENT. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT FROM EACH DIRECTOR ABOUT THEIR VIEWS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD COVERING VARIOUS CRITERIA SUCH AS DEGREE OF FULFILLMENT OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES, BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, ESTABLISHMENT AND DELINEATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, BOARD CULTURE AND DYNAMICS, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE MANAGEMENT AND EFFICACY OF COMMUNICATION WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, OVERSIGHT OF COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES, ETC. FEEDBACK WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM EVERY DIRECTOR ON HIS ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE OTHER DIRECTORS. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (NRC) THEN DISCUSSED THE ABOVE FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS. BASED ON THE INPUTS RECEIVED, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NRC ALSO MADE A PRESENTATION TO THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THEIR MEETING, SUMMARIZING THE INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS AS REGARDS TO BOARD PERFORMANCE AS A WHOLE, AND OF THE CHAIRMAN. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. QUALITATIVE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF DIRECTORS WERE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE DIRECTORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS.

THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND OTHER DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED WHEREAS EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN A SEPARATE MEETING IN WHICH ONLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE PRESENT. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT FROM EACH DIRECTOR ABOUT THEIR VIEWS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD COVERING VARIOUS CRITERIA SUCH AS DEGREE OF FULFILLMENT OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES, BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, ESTABLISHMENT AND DELINEATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, BOARD CULTURE AND DYNAMICS, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE MANAGEMENT AND EFFICACY OF COMMUNICATION WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, OVERSIGHT OF COMPANY’S SUBSIDIARIES, ETC. FEEDBACK WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM EVERY DIRECTOR ON HIS ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE OTHER DIRECTORS. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (NRC) THEN DISCUSSED THE ABOVE FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS. BASED ON THE INPUTS RECEIVED, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NRC ALSO MADE A PRESENTATION TO THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THEIR MEETING, SUMMARIZING THE INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS AS REGARDS TO BOARD PERFORMANCE AS A WHOLE, AND OF THE CHAIRMAN. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. QUALITATIVE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF DIRECTORS WERE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE DIRECTORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS.

PURSUANT TO THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 & SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS & DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS) REGULATIONS, 2015, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, PERFORMANCE OF ITS DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN & NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND OTHER DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED WHEREAS EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN A SEPARATE MEETING IN WHICH ONLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE PRESENT. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT FROM EACH DIRECTOR ABOUT THEIR VIEWS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD COVERING VARIOUS CRITERIA SUCH AS DEGREE OF FULFILLMENT OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES, BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, ESTABLISHMENT AND DELINEATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, BOARD CULTURE AND DYNAMICS, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE MANAGEMENT AND EFFICACY OF COMMUNICATION WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, OVERSIGHT OF COMPANY’S SUBSIDIARIES, ETC. FEEDBACK WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM EVERY DIRECTOR ON HIS ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE OTHER DIRECTORS. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (NRC) THEN DISCUSSED THE ABOVE FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS. BASED ON THE INPUTS RECEIVED, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NRC ALSO MADE A PRESENTATION TO THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THEIR MEETING, SUMMARIZING THE INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS AS REGARDS TO BOARD PERFORMANCE AS A WHOLE, AND OF THE CHAIRMAN. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON- INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. QUALITATIVE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF DIRECTORS WERE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE DIRECTORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS. SOME OF THE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ON THE BASIS OF WHICH THE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS DONE ARE AS FOLLOWS: A) ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN LONG-TERM STRATEGIC PLANNING. B) ABILITY TO CONTRIBUTE GOOD PRACTICES INTERNATIONALLY C) TO DEAL WITH TOP MANAGEMENT ISSUES. D) FULFILLMENT OF DIRECTOR’S RESPONSIBILITIES AS PRESCRIBED UNDER THE ACT. E) COMMITMENT TO ATTEND MEETINGS OF BOARD AND COMMITTEES. F) ABILITY TO MONITOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE OF COMPANY AND EFFECTIVE SUGGESTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT IF ANY REQUIRED.

THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND OTHER DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE ENTIRE BOARD EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED WHEREAS EVALUATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS WAS DONE BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS IN A SEPARATE MEETING IN WHICH ONLY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WERE PRESENT. FEEDBACK WAS SOUGHT FROM EACH DIRECTOR ABOUT THEIR VIEWS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD COVERING VARIOUS CRITERIA SUCH AS DEGREE OF FULFILLMENT OF KEY RESPONSIBILITIES, BOARD STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION, ESTABLISHMENT AND DELINEATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES TO VARIOUS COMMITTEES, EFFECTIVENESS OF BOARD PROCESSES, INFORMATION AND FUNCTIONING, BOARD CULTURE AND DYNAMICS, QUALITY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BOARD AND THE MANAGEMENT AND EFFICACY OF COMMUNICATION WITH EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, COMPLIANCE, OVERSIGHT OF COMPANY’S SUBSIDIARIES, ETC. FEEDBACK WAS ALSO TAKEN FROM EVERY DIRECTOR ON HIS ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF EACH OF THE OTHER DIRECTORS. THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE (NRC) THEN DISCUSSED THE ABOVE FEEDBACK RECEIVED FROM ALL THE DIRECTORS. BASED ON THE INPUTS RECEIVED, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NRC ALSO MADE A PRESENTATION TO THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AT THEIR MEETING, SUMMARIZING THE INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS AS REGARDS TO BOARD PERFORMANCE AS A WHOLE, AND OF THE CHAIRMAN. THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN AND THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS CARRIED OUT BY THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. QUALITATIVE COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS OF DIRECTORS WERE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE. THE DIRECTORS HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR SATISFACTION WITH THE EVALUATION PROCESS.

THE NOMINATION AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE LAYS DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND OTHER DIRECTORS, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17 OF LISTING REGULATIONS, THE BOARD HAS CARRIED OUT AN ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ITS OWN PERFORMANCE, THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AS WELL AS THE EVALUATION OF THE WORKING OF ITS COMMITTEES. THE PROVISIONS AS SPECIFIED IN REGULATION 17 SHALL NOT BE APPLICABLE DURING THE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS PERIOD IN RESPECT OF A LISTED ENTITY OR A ‘HIGH VALUE DEBT LISTED ENTITY’ WHICH IS UNDERGOING CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER THE INSOLVENCY CODE. PROVIDED THAT THE ROLE AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS SPECIFIED UNDER REGULATION 17 SHALL BE FULFILLED BY THE INTERIM RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL OR RESOLUTION PROFESSIONAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 17 AND 23 OF THE INSOLVENCY CODE.

Note:

The information shown above is as provided by the company/updated by us.
There could be a time lag between the date of company filing information/correction with us and the same getting reflected on this website, mainly because of the processes involved as also the need for data verification/cleaning.
Board evaluation details have been captured as disclosed by the companies. No editing/error correction has been done.
Data for a company prior to its listing on NSE is not available.
Data for Companies exclusively listed on BSE with market capitalization more than Rs. 1000 crore is available from 1st April 2019 onwards.
In case you notice any discrepancies with the data, you are requested to let us know immediately so that we can take appropriate action.

SKILLS/COMPETENCIES

Sl.No.	Director Name	Skills/Competencies
1.	SHYAM SUNDER GENDALAL MUNDRA (MR.)	ACCOUNTS/AUDIT/TAXATION INDUSTRIALS LEADERSHIP/MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
2.	ANURAG SHYAM SUNDER MUNDRA (MR.)	FINANCE HUMAN RESOURCES INDUSTRIALS LEADERSHIP/MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
3.	VIKALP SHYAM SUNDER MUNDRA (MR.)	INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS STRATEGY

Note:

The information shown above is as provided by the company/updated by us.
There could be a time lag between the date of company filing information/correction with us and the same getting reflected on this website, mainly because of the processes involved as also the need for data verification/cleaning.
Skills/Competencies of directors are disclosed by companies in their Annual Reports. We have further standardised and uniqued the same.
Data for a company prior to its listing on NSE is not available.
Data for Companies exclusively listed on BSE with market capitalization more than Rs. 1000 crore is available from 1st April 2019 onwards.
In case you notice any discrepancies with the data, you are requested to let us know immediately so that we can take appropriate action.

Indian Boards Database

UJAAS ENERGY LTD.

PRESENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS As last updated by the Company/Indian Boards on 26-JUL-2024

COMMITTEES

REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (Rs.lacs)

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (Rs.lacs)

CESSATION OF DIRECTORS

NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR CESSATIONS

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR CESSATIONS

ATTENDANCE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

BOARD EVALUATION DETAILS

SKILLS/COMPETENCIES

To view more data, you need to register with us.

Not a member yet? Join

Change Password

Indian Boards Database

UJAAS ENERGY LTD.

PRESENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS As last updated by the Company/Indian Boards on 26-JUL-2024

COMMITTEES

REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (Rs.lacs)

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS (Rs.lacs)

CESSATION OF DIRECTORS

NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR CESSATIONS

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR CESSATIONS

ATTENDANCE

EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

BOARD EVALUATION DETAILS

SKILLS/COMPETENCIES

To view more data, you need to register with us.

Existing User? Log In

Not a member yet? Join

Change Password