|
|
NECESSARY POLICIES AND THE CRITERIA FOR THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DIRECTORS AS INDIVIDUAL, BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE DEVISED BY THE COMPANY. EVALUATION OF BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE BEING DONE UNDER BEST PRACTICES PREVALENT IN THE INDUSTRY. THE RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION ARE SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. THE COMPANY ENSURES CONSTITUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITH AN APPROPRIATE COMPOSITION, SIZE, DIVERSIFIED EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE AND COMMITMENT TO DISCHARGE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES EFFECTIVELY. NOMINATION & REMUNERATION COMMITTEE FORMULATED BY THE COMPANY’S BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 178 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17(10) OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS), REGULATIONS,2015 EVALUATES THE EACH INDIVIDUAL WHETHER THEY MET THE SPECIFIED CRITERIA AND PROVIDES VALUABLE CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMPANY. |
THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS, 2015 HAS ENABLED AN EVALUATION MECHANISM TO APPRAISE THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. IN TERMS OF THAT, THE NOMINATION & REMUNERATION COMMITTEE OF THE COMPANY HAS LAID DOWN THE CRITERIA FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. THE PERFORMANCE OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS SHALL BE DONE BY THE ENTIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (EXCLUDING THE DIRECTOR BEING EVALUATED) AND ON THE BASIS OF EVALUATION, IT SHALL BE DETERMINED WHETHER TO EXTEND OR CONTINUE THE TERM OF APPOINTMENT OF THE INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR.1.FREQUENCY OF MEETINGS ATTENDED 2. TIMELINESS OF CIRCULATING AGENDA FOR MEETINGS AND DESCRIPTIVENESS 3. QUALITY, QUANTITY AND TIMELINESS OF FLOW OF INFORMATION TO THE BOARD 4. PROMPTNESS WITH WHICH MINUTES OF THE MEETINGS ARE DRAWN AND CIRCULATED 5. OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS MATTERS OF CRITICAL IMPORTANCE, BEFORE DECISIONS ARE MADE 6. FAMILIARITY WITH THE OBJECTS, OPERATIONS AND OTHER FUNCTIONS OF THE COMPANY 7. IMPORTANCE GIVEN TO INTERNAL AUDIT REPORTS, MANAGEMENT RESPONSES AND STEPS TOWARDS IMPROVEMENT 8. AVOIDANCE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST 9. EXERCISE OF FISCAL OVERSIGHT AND MONITORING FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 10. LEVEL OF MONITORING OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REGULATIONS AND COMPLIANCE 11. ADHERENCE TO CODE OF CONDUCT AND BUSINESS ETHICS BY DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY 12. MONITORING OF REGULATORY COMPLIANCES AND RISK ASSESSMENT 13. REVIEW OF INTERNAL CONTROL SYSTEMS 14. PERFORMANCE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMPANY INCLUDING LEADERSHIP QUALITIES. 15. PERFORMANCE OF THE WHOLE TIME DIRECTOR 16. OVERALL PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD/ COMMITTEES. |
NECESSARY POLICIES AND THE CRITERIA FOR THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DIRECTORS AS INDIVIDUAL, BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE DEVISED BY THE COMPANY. EVALUATION OF BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE BEING DONE UNDER BEST PRACTICES PREVALENT IN THE INDUSTRY. THE COMPANY ENSURES CONSTITUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITH AN APPROPRIATE COMPOSITION, SIZE, DIVERSIFIED EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE AND COMMITMENT TO DISCHARGE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES EFFECTIVELY. NOMINATION & REMUNERATION COMMITTEE FORMULATED BY THE COMPANY'S BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 178 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17(10) OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS), REGULATIONS,2015 EVALUATES THE EACH INDIVIDUAL WHETHER THEY MET THE SPECIFIED CRITERIA AND PROVIDES VALUABLE CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMPANY. |
NECESSARY POLICIES AND THE CRITERIA FOR THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DIRECTORS AS INDIVIDUAL, BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE DEVISED BY THE COMPANY. EVALUATION OF BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE BEING DONE UNDER BEST PRACTICES PREVALENT IN THE INDUSTRY. THE RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION ARE SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. THE COMPANY ENSURES CONSTITUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITH AN APPROPRIATE COMPOSITION, SIZE, DIVERSIFIED EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE AND COMMITMENT TO DISCHARGE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES EFFECTIVELY. NOMINATION & REMUNERATION COMMITTEE FORMULATED BY THE COMPANY’S BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 178 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17(10) OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS), REGULATIONS, 2015 EVALUATES THE EACH INDIVIDUAL WHETHER THEY MET THE SPECIFIED CRITERIA AND PROVIDES VALUABLE CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMPANY. |
NECESSARY POLICIES AND THE CRITERIA FOR THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF DIRECTORS AS INDIVIDUAL, BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE DEVISED BY THE COMPANY. EVALUATION OF BOARD AND COMMITTEES ARE BEING DONE UNDER BEST PRACTICES PREVALENT IN THE INDUSTRY. THE RESULTS OF THE EVALUATION ARE SATISFACTORY AND ADEQUATE AND MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF THE COMPANY. THE COMPANY ENSURES CONSTITUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WITH AN APPROPRIATE COMPOSITION, SIZE, DIVERSIFIED EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE AND COMMITMENT TO DISCHARGE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES EFFECTIVELY. NOMINATION & REMUNERATION COMMITTEE FORMULATED BY THE COMPANY’S BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 178 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND REGULATION 17(10) OF SEBI (LISTING OBLIGATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS), REGULATIONS, 2015 EVALUATES THE EACH INDIVIDUAL WHETHER THEY MET THE SPECIFIED CRITERIA AND PROVIDES VALUABLE CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMPANY. |