THE BOARD OF THE COMPANY WAS SUSPENDED BECAUSE OF CORPORATE INSOLVENCY & RESOLUTION PROCESS; HENCE NO SUCH FORMAL BOARD EVALUATION WAS DONE DURING THE YEAR. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATED THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: • STRUCTURED EVALUATION FORMS, AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, FOR EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND EACH DIRECTOR WERE CIRCULATED TO ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ALONG WITH THE AGENDA PAPERS. • THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD WERE REQUESTED TO EVALUATE BY FILLING THE EVALUATION FORMS AND THE DULY FILLED IN EVALUATION FORMS WERE REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO THE COMPANY SECRETARY IN A SEALED ENVELOPE OR PERSONALLY SUBMITTED TO THE CHAIRMAN AT THE CONCERNED MEETING. • THE BOARD ALSO PROVIDED AN INDIVIDUAL FEEDBACK TO THE CONCERNED DIRECTOR ON AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT, IF ANY. A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS HELD ON 31ST MARCH, 2018 TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN, THE NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, THE BOARD AND FLOW OF INFORMATION FROM MANAGEMENT. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATED THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: • STRUCTURED EVALUATION FORMS, AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, FOR EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND EACH DIRECTOR WERE CIRCULATED TO ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ALONG WITH THE AGENDA PAPERS. • THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD WERE REQUESTED TO EVALUATE BY FILLING THE EVALUATION FORMS AND THE DULY FILLED IN EVALUATION FORMS WERE REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO THE COMPANY SECRETARY IN A SEALED ENVELOPE OR PERSONALLY SUBMITTED TO THE CHAIRMAN AT THE CONCERNED MEETING. • THE BOARD ALSO PROVIDED AN INDIVIDUAL FEEDBACK TO THE CONCERNED DIRECTOR ON AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT, IF ANY. A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN, THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, THE BOARD AND FLOW OF INFORMATION FROM MANAGEMENT. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATED THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: • STRUCTURED EVALUATION FORMS, AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, FOR EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND EACH DIRECTOR WERE CIRCULATED TO ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ALONG WITH THE AGENDA PAPERS. • THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD WERE REQUESTED TO EVALUATE BY FILLING THE EVALUATION FORMS AND THE DULY FILLED IN EVALUATION FORMS WERE REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO THE COMPANY SECRETARY IN A SEALED ENVELOPE OR PERSONALLY SUBMITTED TO THE CHAIRMAN AT THE CONCERNED MEETING. • THE BOARD ALSO PROVIDED AN INDIVIDUAL FEEDBACK TO THE CONCERNED DIRECTOR ON AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT, IF ANY. A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS HELD ON 31ST MARCH, 2017 TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN, THE NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, THE BOARD AND FLOW OF INFORMATION FROM MANAGEMENT. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATED THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: STRUCTURED EVALUATION FORMS, AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, FOR EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND EACH DIRECTOR WERE CIRCULATED TO ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ALONG WITH THE AGENDA PAPERS. THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD WERE REQUESTED TO EVALUATE BY FILLING THE EVALUATION FORMS AND THE DULY FILLED IN EVALUATION FORMS WERE REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO THE COMPANY SECRETARY IN A SEALED ENVELOPE OR PERSONALLY SUBMITTED TO THE CHAIRMAN AT THE CONCERNED MEETING. THE BOARD ALSO PROVIDED AN INDIVIDUAL FEEDBACK TO THE CONCERNED DIRECTOR ON AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT, IF ANY. A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS WAS HELD ON 31ST MARCH, 2019 TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN, THE NON INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, THE BOARD AND FLOW OF INFORMATION FROM MANAGEMENT. |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS EVALUATED THE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD AS A WHOLE, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND THE DIRECTORS INDIVIDUALLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 AND LISTING REGULATIONS IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: STRUCTURED EVALUATION FORMS,AFTER TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION INPUTS RECEIVED FROM THE DIRECTORS, COVERING VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE BOARD’S FUNCTIONING SUCH AS ADEQUACY OF THE COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEES, BOARD CULTURE, EXECUTION AND PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIC DUTIES, OBLIGATIONS AND GOVERNANCE, FOR EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE BOARD, ITS COMMITTEE’S AND EACH DIRECTOR WERE CIRCULATED TO ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD ALONG WITH THE AGENDA PAPERS. THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD WERE REQUESTED TO EVALUATE BY FILLING THE EVALUATION FORMS AND THE DULY FILLED IN EVALUATION FORMS WERE REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO THE COMPANY SECRETARY IN A SEALED ENVELOPE OR PERSONALLY SUBMITTED TO THE CHAIRMAN AT THE CONCERNED MEETING. THE BOARD ALSO PROVIDED AN INDIVIDUAL FEEDBACK TO THE CONCERNED DIRECTOR ON AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT, IF ANY. A SEPARATE MEETING OF INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE CHAIRMAN, THE NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS, THE BOARD AND FLOW OF INFORMATION FROM MANAGEMENT COULD NOT BE HELD AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTOR GOT SUSPENDED BY THE ORDER OF THE HON’BLE NCLT. |